Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1991 | BC 1991 01020 5
Original file (BC 1991 01020 5.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
SECOND ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:			DOCKET NUMBERS:  BC-1991-01020
COUNSEL: None
	                 			HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable.  

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 2 November 1951, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air 
Force at the age of 17 in the grade of airman basic (E-1).  On 
17 September 1952, he was tried by special court-martial for a 
charge for failure to go to his appointed place of duty and 
disobedience of a lawful order.  Following pleas of not guilty, 
the court found him guilty and sentenced him to a BCD, 
confinement at hard labor for six months, and forfeiture of $55 
per month for six months.  On 14 February 1953, the applicant 
was discharged under the provisions of Air Force Regulation 
(AFR) 39-18, Special Court-Martial Order 91, with a BCD.  He 
served 7 months and 25 days on active duty with 228 days of lost 
time.  

On 6 August 1991 and 23 October 2003, the Board considered and 
denied the applicant’s requests to upgrade his BCD to an 
honorable discharge. For an accounting of the facts and 
circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation; and, the 
rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see the Record 
of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit H and the Addendum to Record of 
Proceedings at Exhibit J.  

On 28 July 2005 and 26 August 2010, the Board considered and 
denied the applicant’s request for reconsideration of his appeal 
based on no new relevant evidence to support his requests.  

On 2 April 2013, the applicant submitted a request for 
reconsideration of his appeal to change his BCD to an honorable 
discharge. 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides as evidence 
personal statements, military records, birth certificate, 
adoption documents, several character references, and several 
newspaper articles. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit K.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1. In earlier findings, the Board determined there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant an upgrade of the applicant’s 
discharge based on clemency.  After thoroughly reviewing the 
additional documentation submitted in support of this appeal and 
the evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has 
overcome the rationale expressed in the previous decisions.  
Therefore, we do not find the additional evidence presented is 
sufficient to warrant the relief sought on that basis.  In the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which 
to recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s request. 

2. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-1991-01020 in Executive Session on 12 February 2014, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

			                    , Panel Chair
			                    , Member
			                    , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1991-01020:

    Exhibit H.  ROP, dated 15 Aug 91, w/Exhibits A through G.
    Exhibit J.  Addendum to ROP, dated 2 Dec 03, w/Exhibit I.
    Exhibit K.  Letter, Applicant, dated 2 Apr 13, w/atchs.




								                         
								Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1991 | BC 1991 01020 6

    Original file (BC 1991 01020 6.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THIRD ADDENDUM RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1991-01020 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES RESUME OF CASE: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge. After a thorough review of the evidence the applicant submitted in support of his request for reconsideration and determined that it was not sufficient to overcome the rationale expressed in the Board’s previous decisions. For a complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1990 | BC 1990 02737 2

    Original file (BC 1990 02737 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 2009, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit L). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant correcting the records to upgrade the applicant’s discharge. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1991-01020-2

    Original file (BC-1991-01020-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 August 1991, the applicant’s request to have his bad conduct discharge upgraded to honorable was considered and denied by the Board. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation Report Number 792606C dated 13 June 2003, the applicant has had no other convictions since those events cited in the report at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC 2006 00086 2

    Original file (BC 2006 00086 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00086 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to an Honorable discharge. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s original request and rationale for the earlier decision by the board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit G. On 5 Mar 14, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1992-01342-2

    Original file (BC-1992-01342-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFBCMR Staff assumed the applicant was referring to his most recent case (BC-2004-02624), which was denied on 27 Dec 04, and in a letter dated 3 May 06 (Exhibit K), requested he provide copies of documents he alluded to his 14 Feb 06 submission. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After reviewing the applicant’s latest submissions, a majority of the Board reconsidered his appeal but found the documentation insufficient to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1991 | BC 1991 01656

    Original file (BC 1991 01656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 15 Aug 91, the Board considered the applicant’s original request to show that his officer effectiveness report (OER) for the period 12 May 86 through 27 Nov 86 be removed from his record and he be given special selection board (SSB) promotion consideration for the calendar year 1987 lieutenant colonel board. Although the Board determined his application was not timely filed, they reviewed the case on its...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1986 | BC 1986 04163 3

    Original file (BC 1986 04163 3.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 May 09, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration of his request to have his general discharge upgraded to honorable. The reasons for his discharge are well documented in his record. Exhibit L. Applicant's Reconsideration Request, dated 4 Sep 09.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC -1991-01786-2

    Original file (BC -1991-01786-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit F. On 1 July 2000, applicant submitted an application requesting reconsideration that his discharge be upgraded. A copy of the AFBCMR letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. On 26 May 2004, applicant submitted an application requesting reconsideration that his discharge be upgraded at least to a general. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-1991-01786-2 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2001-01784-3

    Original file (BC-2001-01784-3.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete submission, with attachments is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s prior submissions, and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart medal. _________________________________________________________________ The following members...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-01144A

    Original file (BC-1998-01144A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1998-01144 INDEX CODE 106.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his 1998 dishonorable discharge be upgraded to under-other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge. On 8 Jul 96, the US Air Force Court of...